{"analyzer_versions":{"semgrep":"1.163.0"},"body":{"audit_stages":[{"blockers":[],"completed_at":"2026-09-23T13:49:51.139Z","description":"Normalize the submitted contract target and confirm it can enter the Solidity audit lane.","elapsed_ms":320,"id":"intake","label":"Audit intake","limitations":[],"next_step":"Acquire verified source or scan the pasted Solidity source.","order":1,"status":"passed"},{"blockers":[],"completed_at":"2026-09-23T13:49:51.139Z","description":"Resolve pasted source or verified explorer source without treating malformed input as demo data.","elapsed_ms":1450,"id":"source_acquisition","label":"Source acquisition","limitations":[],"next_step":"Validate the analyzer toolchain against the acquired source.","order":2,"status":"passed"},{"blockers":[],"completed_at":"2026-09-23T13:49:51.139Z","description":"Confirm the configured static analyzers can run and produce parseable output.","elapsed_ms":2300,"id":"toolchain_validation","label":"Toolchain validation","limitations":[],"next_step":"Run static analysis and capture raw detector evidence.","order":3,"status":"passed"},{"blockers":[],"completed_at":"2026-09-23T13:49:51.139Z","description":"Run static analyzers against the sandboxed source and collect raw detector evidence.","elapsed_ms":8800,"findings_count":16,"id":"static_analysis","label":"Static analysis","limitations":[],"next_step":"Normalize detector output into one deduped finding set.","order":4,"status":"passed"},{"blockers":[],"completed_at":"2026-09-23T13:49:51.139Z","description":"Dedupe detectors, classify vulnerability classes and compute severity-weighted risk.","elapsed_ms":1150,"findings_count":16,"id":"finding_normalization","label":"Finding normalization","limitations":[],"next_step":"Review exploitability conservatively against confidence and limitations.","order":5,"status":"passed"},{"blockers":[],"completed_at":"2026-09-23T13:49:51.139Z","description":"Frame automated findings with conservative exploitability and limitation notes.","elapsed_ms":1900,"findings_count":16,"id":"exploitability_review","label":"Exploitability review","limitations":["Automated exploitability review is conservative and does not replace a manual exploitability assessment."],"next_step":"Draft remediation notes from the normalized evidence.","order":6,"status":"partial"},{"blockers":[],"completed_at":"2026-09-23T13:49:51.139Z","description":"Prepare remediation-oriented evidence for the shareable report artifact.","elapsed_ms":1500,"findings_count":16,"id":"remediation_draft","label":"Remediation draft","limitations":["Remediation notes are generated from detector evidence and require project-specific engineering review."],"next_step":"Attach an operator review artifact before claiming human review.","order":7,"status":"partial"},{"blockers":["No operator review artifact is attached to this automated scan."],"completed_at":"2026-09-23T13:49:51.139Z","description":"Record whether a human operator artifact exists before buyer escalation.","elapsed_ms":0,"id":"operator_review","label":"Operator review","limitations":["Human operator review has not been attached to this automated scan yet."],"next_step":"Attach a real operator review artifact before claiming human review.","order":8,"status":"blocked"},{"artifact":{"created_at":"2026-09-23T13:49:51.139Z","id":"solidity-2f746d702f766567","label":"Automated Solidity report","type":"report"},"blockers":[],"completed_at":"2026-09-23T13:49:51.139Z","description":"Publish the automated report artifact or explain why the scan failed closed.","elapsed_ms":620,"findings_count":16,"id":"finalization","label":"Finalization","limitations":["Final report is an automated static-analysis artifact; no operator review artifact is attached."],"next_step":"Share the report with explicit limitations and review state.","order":9,"status":"partial"}],"counts":{"access-control":0,"centralization":0,"flash-loan":0,"front-running":0,"gas-dos":1,"logic":13,"math-overflow":0,"oracle-manipulation":0,"other":0,"reentrancy":1,"timestamp-dependence":0,"unchecked-call":1,"uninitialized":0},"executive_summary":["16 findings surfaced (0 critical, 2 high, 0 medium, 0 low, 14 informational).","HIGH · Reentrancy in PERSONAL_BANK.Collect(uint256) (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#47-60): (Collect) — exploitability medium.","HIGH · LogFile (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#73-97) contract sets array length with a user-controlled value: (LogFile) — exploitability medium.","Automated static analysis only. A human operator review has not been attached to this report."],"findings":[{"class":"reentrancy","component":"Collect","confidence":"medium","description":"Reentrancy in PERSONAL_BANK.Collect(uint256) (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#47-60):\n\tExternal calls:\n\t- msg.sender.call.value(_am)() (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#54)\n\tState variables written after the call(s):\n\t- balances[msg.sender] -= _am (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#56)\n\tPERSONAL_BANK.balances (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#11) can be used in cross function reentrancies:\n\t- PERSONAL_BANK.Collect(uint256) (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#47-60)\n\t- PERSONAL_BANK.Deposit() (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#39-45)\n\t- PERSONAL_BANK.balances (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#11)\n","end_line":60,"exploitability":"medium","exploitability_note":"Medium-confidence detection; manual review required before relying on the finding either way.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"be17209907e972ae71cf307d0c8f86aa638fc3afdac4946592499d4cdf419cf0","line":47,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#reentrancy-eth"],"remediation":"Apply the checks-effects-interactions pattern. State writes must happen before external calls, and consider OpenZeppelin's ReentrancyGuard for high-risk entry points.","rule_id":"slither:reentrancy-eth","severity":"high","source":"slither","title":"Reentrancy in PERSONAL_BANK.Collect(uint256) (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#47-60):"},{"class":"gas-dos","component":"LogFile","confidence":"medium","description":"LogFile (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#73-97) contract sets array length with a user-controlled value:\n\t- History.push(LastMsg) (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#94)\n","end_line":97,"exploitability":"medium","exploitability_note":"Medium-confidence detection; manual review required before relying on the finding either way.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"4d245ca7eee0a399a1e98c2dc82ccd992096daa414a997a27a6a499524ff3048","line":73,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#controlled-array-length"],"remediation":"Cap loop bounds, paginate iteration, and ensure no user can grow a state structure the contract must traverse to make progress.","rule_id":"slither:controlled-array-length","severity":"high","source":"slither","title":"LogFile (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#73-97) contract sets array length with a user-controlled value:"},{"class":"logic","component":"^0.4.19","confidence":"high","description":"Version constraint ^0.4.19 contains known severe issues (https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bugs.html)\n\t- DirtyBytesArrayToStorage\n\t- ABIDecodeTwoDimensionalArrayMemory\n\t- KeccakCaching\n\t- EmptyByteArrayCopy\n\t- DynamicArrayCleanup\n\t- ImplicitConstructorCallvalueCheck\n\t- TupleAssignmentMultiStackSlotComponents\n\t- MemoryArrayCreationOverflow\n\t- privateCanBeOverridden\n\t- SignedArrayStorageCopy\n\t- ABIEncoderV2StorageArrayWithMultiSlotElement\n\t- DynamicConstructorArgumentsClippedABIV2\n\t- UninitializedFunctionPointerInConstructor_0.4.x\n\t- IncorrectEventSignatureInLibraries_0.4.x\n\t- ABIEncoderV2PackedStorage_0.4.x\n\t- ExpExponentCleanup\n\t- EventStructWrongData\n\t- NestedArrayFunctionCallDecoder.\nIt is used by:\n\t- ^0.4.19 (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#7)\n","exploitability":"low","exploitability_note":"Informational signal; not directly exploitable without additional context.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"7b515ab2e7d4b3bf0881c42fce2686ec5dd35ec3cac507717576c446dc6192bf","line":7,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#solc-version"],"remediation":"Re-derive the business rule by hand, write a property-based test that fails on the current path, and only then fix the implementation.","rule_id":"slither:solc-version","severity":"informational","source":"slither","title":"Version constraint ^0.4.19 contains known severe issues (https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bugs.html)"},{"class":"logic","component":"PERSONAL_BANK","confidence":"high","description":"Contract PERSONAL_BANK (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#9-69) is not in CapWords\n","end_line":69,"exploitability":"low","exploitability_note":"Informational signal; not directly exploitable without additional context.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"d7395fe686701401df4ce164a8f885fde90dc6c3b8e09aa4e9af498ca3cf535c","line":9,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#naming-convention"],"remediation":"Re-derive the business rule by hand, write a property-based test that fails on the current path, and only then fix the implementation.","rule_id":"slither:naming-convention","severity":"informational","source":"slither","title":"Contract PERSONAL_BANK (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#9-69) is not in CapWords"},{"class":"logic","component":"MinSum","confidence":"high","description":"Variable PERSONAL_BANK.MinSum (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#13) is not in mixedCase\n","exploitability":"low","exploitability_note":"Informational signal; not directly exploitable without additional context.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"4f394895cdd92f241827094e30b83559049024b18b65ff7b90d7dc41784da707","line":13,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#naming-convention"],"remediation":"Re-derive the business rule by hand, write a property-based test that fails on the current path, and only then fix the implementation.","rule_id":"slither:naming-convention","severity":"informational","source":"slither","title":"Variable PERSONAL_BANK.MinSum (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#13) is not in mixedCase"},{"class":"logic","component":"Log","confidence":"high","description":"Variable PERSONAL_BANK.Log (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#15) is not in mixedCase\n","exploitability":"low","exploitability_note":"Informational signal; not directly exploitable without additional context.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"10fc4c3795166605e37c32072ce8d1b8c7fa41fa2780d34168ca60090e068d32","line":15,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#naming-convention"],"remediation":"Re-derive the business rule by hand, write a property-based test that fails on the current path, and only then fix the implementation.","rule_id":"slither:naming-convention","severity":"informational","source":"slither","title":"Variable PERSONAL_BANK.Log (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#15) is not in mixedCase"},{"class":"logic","component":"_val","confidence":"high","description":"Parameter PERSONAL_BANK.SetMinSum(uint256)._val (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#19) is not in mixedCase\n","exploitability":"low","exploitability_note":"Informational signal; not directly exploitable without additional context.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"0dc987a01c48a8b3063060c1b2838535a5e1544a82e6358d06efca30bd2eb2ce","line":19,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#naming-convention"],"remediation":"Re-derive the business rule by hand, write a property-based test that fails on the current path, and only then fix the implementation.","rule_id":"slither:naming-convention","severity":"informational","source":"slither","title":"Parameter PERSONAL_BANK.SetMinSum(uint256)._val (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#19) is not in mixedCase"},{"class":"logic","component":"_log","confidence":"high","description":"Parameter PERSONAL_BANK.SetLogFile(address)._log (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#26) is not in mixedCase\n","exploitability":"low","exploitability_note":"Informational signal; not directly exploitable without additional context.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"ca312c1c2c6e8b9ff742b43354c9c60c54d952680196a38717201470570e9fc6","line":26,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#naming-convention"],"remediation":"Re-derive the business rule by hand, write a property-based test that fails on the current path, and only then fix the implementation.","rule_id":"slither:naming-convention","severity":"informational","source":"slither","title":"Parameter PERSONAL_BANK.SetLogFile(address)._log (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#26) is not in mixedCase"},{"class":"logic","component":"Initialized","confidence":"high","description":"Function PERSONAL_BANK.Initialized() (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#33-37) is not in mixedCase\n","end_line":37,"exploitability":"low","exploitability_note":"Informational signal; not directly exploitable without additional context.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"3ad4debfec486887fc5e5852cbda47e3eea0deef0b660e8fcc230e14386dabb1","line":33,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#naming-convention"],"remediation":"Re-derive the business rule by hand, write a property-based test that fails on the current path, and only then fix the implementation.","rule_id":"slither:naming-convention","severity":"informational","source":"slither","title":"Function PERSONAL_BANK.Initialized() (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#33-37) is not in mixedCase"},{"class":"logic","component":"Deposit","confidence":"high","description":"Function PERSONAL_BANK.Deposit() (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#39-45) is not in mixedCase\n","end_line":45,"exploitability":"low","exploitability_note":"Informational signal; not directly exploitable without additional context.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"ddbf895f6aa22ee38d2d855c45e9f9d9b5cc0de1386ce1b0e9f966c878d9c9a0","line":39,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#naming-convention"],"remediation":"Re-derive the business rule by hand, write a property-based test that fails on the current path, and only then fix the implementation.","rule_id":"slither:naming-convention","severity":"informational","source":"slither","title":"Function PERSONAL_BANK.Deposit() (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#39-45) is not in mixedCase"},{"class":"unchecked-call","component":"Collect","confidence":"high","description":"Low level call in PERSONAL_BANK.Collect(uint256) (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#47-60):\n\t- msg.sender.call.value(_am)() (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#54)\n","end_line":60,"exploitability":"low","exploitability_note":"Informational signal; not directly exploitable without additional context.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"417c5b7af20fc8e9856f3ffac796736eb980198232c8b55a3d2012e653fa4ea4","line":47,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#low-level-calls"],"remediation":"Check the boolean return of low-level call/delegatecall/send and revert on failure with a descriptive reason string.","rule_id":"slither:low-level-calls","severity":"informational","source":"slither","title":"Low level call in PERSONAL_BANK.Collect(uint256) (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#47-60):"},{"class":"logic","component":"Collect","confidence":"high","description":"Function PERSONAL_BANK.Collect(uint256) (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#47-60) is not in mixedCase\n","end_line":60,"exploitability":"low","exploitability_note":"Informational signal; not directly exploitable without additional context.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"7897376de668cc89b3bdc44df1f7bf80528fd255278c102c9b3b29c3bf6441fa","line":47,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#naming-convention"],"remediation":"Re-derive the business rule by hand, write a property-based test that fails on the current path, and only then fix the implementation.","rule_id":"slither:naming-convention","severity":"informational","source":"slither","title":"Function PERSONAL_BANK.Collect(uint256) (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#47-60) is not in mixedCase"},{"class":"logic","component":"History","confidence":"high","description":"Variable LogFile.History (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#83) is not in mixedCase\n","exploitability":"low","exploitability_note":"Informational signal; not directly exploitable without additional context.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"b8959d9d2a75b6d3dc23575557af2bbedbf431be60d598fd962b395014d6161c","line":83,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#naming-convention"],"remediation":"Re-derive the business rule by hand, write a property-based test that fails on the current path, and only then fix the implementation.","rule_id":"slither:naming-convention","severity":"informational","source":"slither","title":"Variable LogFile.History (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#83) is not in mixedCase"},{"class":"logic","component":"LastMsg","confidence":"high","description":"Variable LogFile.LastMsg (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#85) is not in mixedCase\n","exploitability":"low","exploitability_note":"Informational signal; not directly exploitable without additional context.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"7f7486569b8c251dba34fa1cbdb901b671516d3339b1fb0d7a8260fc460724a6","line":85,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#naming-convention"],"remediation":"Re-derive the business rule by hand, write a property-based test that fails on the current path, and only then fix the implementation.","rule_id":"slither:naming-convention","severity":"informational","source":"slither","title":"Variable LogFile.LastMsg (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#85) is not in mixedCase"},{"class":"logic","component":"AddMessage","confidence":"high","description":"AddMessage(address,uint256,string) should be declared external:\n\t- LogFile.AddMessage(address,uint256,string) (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#87-95)\n","end_line":95,"exploitability":"low","exploitability_note":"Informational signal; not directly exploitable without additional context.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"25d2235fb844b90cf9e56ea1c1b8b9cc6e32b18540f2108e0523adc1b1b6c004","line":87,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#external-function"],"remediation":"Re-derive the business rule by hand, write a property-based test that fails on the current path, and only then fix the implementation.","rule_id":"slither:external-function","severity":"informational","source":"slither","title":"AddMessage(address,uint256,string) should be declared external:"},{"class":"logic","component":"_adr","confidence":"high","description":"Parameter LogFile.AddMessage(address,uint256,string)._adr (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#87) is not in mixedCase\n","exploitability":"low","exploitability_note":"Informational signal; not directly exploitable without additional context.","file":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","id":"7b7de59d0d9e60917cb218805b775a225e9faf2333b016b49958c53a659e18df","line":87,"references":["https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#naming-convention"],"remediation":"Re-derive the business rule by hand, write a property-based test that fails on the current path, and only then fix the implementation.","rule_id":"slither:naming-convention","severity":"informational","source":"slither","title":"Parameter LogFile.AddMessage(address,uint256,string)._adr (reentrancy-simple-dao.sol#87) is not in mixedCase"}],"limitations":["VegaSec runs static analysis only. Findings can include false positives, miss patterns the configured detectors do not cover, and never replace manual auditor judgement.","Scan ran slither and semgrep against a single sandboxed copy of the source. Multi-file dependency analysis beyond what slither resolves automatically is out of scope.","This report is not a certification, audit attestation, or financial advice."],"warnings":[]},"canonical_version":"vss-canonical-1","coverage_status":"unknown","final_score":80,"findings_count":16,"generated_at":"2026-09-23T13:49:51.139Z","id":"VSS-20260923-PU1OJH8E","severity_counts":{"critical":0,"high":2,"informational":14,"low":0,"medium":0},"source_filename":"reentrancy-simple-dao.sol","source_hash":"0196d033850b295690465d0f7d2baae8b3570df29c9d03d507496b45155a84e5","surface":"solidity","warnings_count":0}