Thin Liquidity Token Audit
THIN · SOLANA · Report VS-SOLANA-THIN
0
Score / 100
Verdict
Block from promotion
Multiple public-data risk signals detected. Do not rely on this without a manual review.
- Surface analyzed
- Token Audit
- Scan source confidence
- 38%
- Methodology
- Public sources · v0
- Generated
- May 25, 2026, 3:00 PM UTC
Elevated
Automated, not analyst-reviewed
Upgrade path
Need a private evidence memo?
Turn this public artifact into an operator-reviewed Private Review memo. Paid review stays separate from the public score.
Request Private ReviewShare this report
Ready
Public-source signals. Not a substitute for a formal audit. No buy/sell recommendation.
Critical signal
Liquidity
94/100
Critical signal
Owner control
92/100
Critical signal
Holder concentration
88/100
Elevated signal
Trading behavior
73/100
VegaSec summary
This fixture shows an AVOID token case: owner control, fragile liquidity and extreme holder concentration make the risk incompatible with public promotion without manual review.
Risk exposure
Risk exposure by category
Each row is a public-data dimension the audit scored. Higher values mean more signal worth investigating before relying on this asset.
- 94/100
Liquidity
Critical signal
- 92/100
Owner control
Critical signal
- 88/100
Holder concentration
Critical signal
- 73/100
Trading behavior
Elevated signal
- 68/100
Deployer
Elevated signal
- 67/100
Contract surface
Elevated signal
- 58/100
Social proof
Elevated signal
Audit pack
Token posture + provenance
Per-dimension reasoning over the public token surface (DexScreener pair + explorer verified source). Control markers only: never a market position recommendation.
- Source verificationadequate
Evidence
- Contract source is verified on an approved explorer.
Caveats
- Verified source proves the on-chain bytecode matches the published Solidity; it does not prove the code is secure.
Next step
- Pair with the Solidity audit pack for the actual security analysis.
- Contract provenanceadequate
Evidence
- Contract address: So1anaDangerDemo1111111111111111111111111111 on solana.
Caveats
- Provenance only confirms identity; it does not prove the contract is secure.
Next step
- Cross-reference the address with the project's official channels before treating it as canonical.
- Pool liquidityunknown
Caveats
- Liquidity figure was not exposed by the public pair adapter at scan time.
Next step
- Operator review required to gather this dimension before a verdict can be issued.
- Holder distributionunknown
Caveats
- Holder count and concentration were not exposed at scan time.
Next step
- Operator review required to gather this dimension before a verdict can be issued.
- Market ageunknown
Caveats
- Pair creation timestamp was not exposed at scan time.
Next step
- Operator review required to gather this dimension before a verdict can be issued.
- Deployer signalsunknown
Caveats
- Deployer prior-contract history was not exposed at scan time.
Next step
- Operator review required to gather this dimension before a verdict can be issued.
Baseline source confidence
0%
Methodology baseline used by the verdict engine. Higher baseline reduces the penalty for ambiguous data; low baseline pushes the verdict toward UNKNOWN/WATCH. May differ from the scan source confidence shown at the top when the live scan supplied a fresher signal.
How to read this report
Score, confidence, ranking: four moving parts, no hand-tuning.
Generated 2026-05-25T12:00:00.000-03:00 · Token · THIN
Score bands
0-19
AVOID-style triage · this report
Multiple high or critical findings, low source confidence, or unverified context. Public action should pause until a Private Review or a re-scan with better evidence.
20-49
High caution
Notable findings or thin evidence. Worth a Private Review before relying on the artifact.
50-69
Watch
Mixed signals: some evidence, some gaps. Re-scan after material changes to the target.
70-89
Clear surface (automated)
No critical or high findings via static analysis. Not a safety claim: human review is still recommended for diligence work.
90-100
Strong surface (automated)
No critical or high findings, verified source, and high source confidence. Not a safety claim: human review is still recommended for diligence work.
- Score
- Deterministic 0-100 derived from severity counts. Same formula across every report. Lower means more risk.
- Confidence
- Separate axis. Measures how much VegaSec trusts the input data. Low confidence pushes the verdict toward UNKNOWN; the two are never collapsed into one number.
- Ranking / percentile
- Only meaningful within the eligible Trust Index set. Shown on /trust-index when the eligible pool is large enough. Today the public index is a controlled preview.
Private Review is separate
A paid Private Review does not raise the public score on this report. Public score reflects public-source evidence only. Private Review adds operator attestation and a confidential memo, never a score bump.
Community artifact
Report ready to share, copy or export.
This link preserves the scanned target, route, confidence and Scan ID. Example report links are marked as public samples; live Token Audit and Repository Audit links require submitted context and fail closed to UNKNOWN when evidence is missing.
Ready
VegaSec is intelligence and triage. It is not financial advice, does not promise returns and does not replace manual due diligence.